Bloomingdale Bros., Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Bloomingdale Bros., Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 414

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 8, 1958

DocketNo. 61454; protests 171257-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 414 (Bloomingdale Bros., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloomingdale Bros., Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Cust. Ct. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomingdale-bros-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.