Bloomfield v. Tabor

316 S.W.2d 115, 1958 Tex. App. LEXIS 2200
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 2, 1958
DocketNo. 3573
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 316 S.W.2d 115 (Bloomfield v. Tabor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloomfield v. Tabor, 316 S.W.2d 115, 1958 Tex. App. LEXIS 2200 (Tex. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a case in which Tabor sued Bloomfield for $1,150, being the unpaid balance due on an alleged contract to purchase a pit of ensilage feed for $1,500. Trial was to a jury, which found for the plaintiff. The Trial Court rendered judgment for the plaintiff on the jury’s verdict. Defendant appealed to this court. While such appeal is pending, it has been made known to the court that such cause has been settled by and between the parties. From the foregoing it follows that this appeal should be and same is hereby dismissed at cost of appellant.

Dismissed.

HALE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamin v. KUHNAU
374 P.2d 912 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 S.W.2d 115, 1958 Tex. App. LEXIS 2200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomfield-v-tabor-texapp-1958.