Bloomer v. Fowler

97 A. 950, 85 N.J. Eq. 600, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 420
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1916·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affi-mance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Teri-iune, Hbppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor—-14. 'For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloomer v. Fowler, 97 A. 950, 85 N.J. Eq. 600, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 420 (N.J. 1916).

97 A. 950 (Bloomer v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seda-Cog Joint Rail Auth v. Carload Express
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Aurentz v. Planning Board of Little Egg Harbor
408 A.2d 140 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Aurentz v. PLANNING BD., TP., LITTLE EGG HARBOR
408 A.2d 140 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
State ex rel. Stewart v. King
562 S.W.2d 704 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Gorlin v. Cameo Theatres, Inc.
193 A. 189 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)