Bloomer v. Fowler

97 A. 950, 85 N.J. Eq. 600, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 420
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 97 A. 950 (Bloomer v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloomer v. Fowler, 97 A. 950, 85 N.J. Eq. 600, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 420 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affi-mance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Teri-iune, Hbppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor—-14. 'For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seda-Cog Joint Rail Auth v. Carload Express
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Aurentz v. Planning Board of Little Egg Harbor
408 A.2d 140 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Aurentz v. PLANNING BD., TP., LITTLE EGG HARBOR
408 A.2d 140 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
State ex rel. Stewart v. King
562 S.W.2d 704 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Gorlin v. Cameo Theatres, Inc.
193 A. 189 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 950, 85 N.J. Eq. 600, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomer-v-fowler-nj-1916.