Bloomer v. Bloomer
134 A. 915, 100 N.J. Eq. 361, 15 Stock. 361, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 567
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be 'affirmed, for the -reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell,' Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennón, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloomer v. Bloomer, 134 A. 915, 100 N.J. Eq. 361, 15 Stock. 361, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 567 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 915 (Bloomer v. Bloomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Litcher v. Trust Co. of New Jersey
93 A.2d 368 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Mirinda v. King
78 A.2d 98 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)