Bloomburg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bloomburg v. State

463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1293

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 537 (Bloomburg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloomburg v. State, 463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s extensive written statement contains sufficient, valid, clear and convincing reasons to support his departure from the sentencing guidelines and we affirm the sentence on the authority of Albritton v. State, 458 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

We find no merit in appellant’s second point on appeal. The record contains no support for the allegations made in appel[538]*538lant’s untimely motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI