Bloomburg v. State
463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1985·No. No. 84-1293·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s extensive written statement contains sufficient, valid, clear and convincing reasons to support his departure from the sentencing guidelines and we affirm the sentence on the authority of Albritton v. State, 458 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
We find no merit in appellant’s second point on appeal. The record contains no support for the allegations made in appel[538] lant’s untimely motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloomburg v. State, 463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
463 So. 2d 537 (Bloomburg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Angelette v. Hardie
43 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1949)