Bloomberg v. Niebauer
This text of 286 A.D.2d 267 (Bloomberg v. Niebauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered August 10, 2001, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Schoenfeld, J., without costs or disbursements. In addition, we note service was defective as it was in violation of CPLR 2103 (a), as conceded by appellant at oral argument. No opinion. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 267, 732 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloomberg-v-niebauer-nyappdiv-2001.