Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

477 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2397, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16366
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1985·No. No. 85-760·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moved in the trial court for a default against appellant for failure to timely plead. The matter was set for hearing before the trial court, however, appellant never received notice thereof until four days after the hearing date. Entry of a default without adequate notice to appellant was error requiring reversal of the default judgment. Okeechobee Insurance Agency v. Barnett Bank, 434 So.2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 477 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2397, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

477 So. 2d 48 (Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zeigler v. Huston
626 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. Picchi
503 So. 2d 1373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)