Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

477 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2397, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16366
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1985
DocketNo. 85-760
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 477 So. 2d 48 (Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloom v. Palmetto Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 477 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2397, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moved in the trial court for a default against appellant for failure to timely plead. The matter was set for hearing before the trial court, however, appellant never received notice thereof until four days after the hearing date. Entry of a default without adequate notice to appellant was error requiring reversal of the default judgment. Okeechobee Insurance Agency v. Barnett Bank, 434 So.2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zeigler v. Huston
626 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. Picchi
503 So. 2d 1373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2397, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-palmetto-federal-savings-loan-assn-fladistctapp-1985.