Home/Supreme Court/Bloom v. McKune

Bloom v. McKune

178 L. Ed. 2d 741, 131 S. Ct. 930, 562 U.S. 1130, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 319, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 10, 2011
DocketNo. 10-7273
StatusPublished

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 741 (Bloom v. McKune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloom v. McKune, 178 L. Ed. 2d 741, 131 S. Ct. 930, 562 U.S. 1130, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 319, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 220 P.3d 593.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 741, 131 S. Ct. 930, 562 U.S. 1130, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 319, 79 U.S.L.W. 3402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-mckune-scotus-2011.