Bloom v. Mandel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bloom v. Mandel

272 A.D.2d 1043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1043 (Bloom v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloom v. Mandel, 272 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify by eliminating the $1,121.01 damages awarded to plaintiff arising from the breach of contract, for the reason that the evidence fails to disclose that the minds of the parties met upon the terms of the bargain so as to create an enforcible agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify by eliminating the $1,121.01 damages awarded to plaintiff arising from the breach of contract, for the reason that the evidence fails to disclose that the minds of the parties met upon the terms of the bargain so as to create an enforcible agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-mandel-nyappdiv-1947.