Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc.
This text of 273 A.D.2d 187 (Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 8, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant made a prima facie showing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s affidavit presented a feigned issue of fact designed to avoid the consequences of her earlier deposition testimony. As such, it was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Buziashvili v Ryan, 264 AD2d 797; Prunty v Keltie’s Bum Steer, 163 AD2d 595, 596).
The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was devoid of any trace of facts or data. Consequently, it was without probative value (see, Amatulli v Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 NY2d 525, 533). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D.2d 187, 709 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-la-femme-fatale-of-smithtown-inc-nyappdiv-2000.