Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc.

273 A.D.2d 187, 709 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6282

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2000·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 8, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s affidavit presented a feigned issue of fact designed to avoid the consequences of her earlier deposition testimony. As such, it was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Buziashvili v Ryan, 264 AD2d 797; Prunty v Keltie’s Bum Steer, 163 AD2d 595, 596).

The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was devoid of any trace of facts or data. Consequently, it was without probative value (see, Amatulli v Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 NY2d 525, 533). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 8, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s affidavit presented a feigned issue of fact designed to avoid the consequences of her earlier deposition testimony. As such, it was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Buziashvili v Ryan, 264 AD2d 797; Prunty v Keltie’s Bum Steer, 163 AD2d 595, 596).

The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was devoid of any trace of facts or data. Consequently, it was without probative value (see, Amatulli v Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 NY2d 525, 533). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc., 273 A.D.2d 187, 709 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

273 A.D.2d 187 (Bloom v. La Femme Fatale of Smithtown, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related