Bloom v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
This text of 264 A.D. 866 (Bloom v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to rescind a settlement agreement whereby a policy of life insurance, containing provision for disability benefits, was canceled in consideration of the payment of $12,000 to plaintiff’s intestate, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. Assuming that the original plaintiff neither knew nor should have known at the time that he executed the settlement agreement that his claimed total disability resulted from [867]*867a brain tumor rather than heart disease, there was no mutual mistake and no fraud on the part of defendant. The agreement embraced not merely an adjustment of the claim for disability; it served to terminate the contractual relationship of the parties. It was fairly made and is valid despite a mistake of fact by one of the parties. (Sears v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W., 163 N. Y. 374, 378.) Present - Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 866, 35 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-guardian-life-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1942.