Bloom v. Guaranty Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bloom v. Guaranty Trust Co.

109 A. 347, 91 N.J. Eq. 332, 6 Stock. 332, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 296

DecidedMarch 1, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A. 347 (Bloom v. Guaranty Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloom v. Guaranty Trust Co., 109 A. 347, 91 N.J. Eq. 332, 6 Stock. 332, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 296 (N.J. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was properly noticed, for argument, and upon the call of the list was announced to be submitted upon briefs by agreement of counsel. The brief for the respondent was submitted within the time limited by the rule, but no brief has been received from the appellant, nor has any explanation or excuse been furnished to us for the failure. Standing rule No. 17 of this court provides that in case the appellant, after noticing the case for argument, shall fail to bring on the hearing according to rule, the order or decree appealed from shall be affirmed, or the appeal dismissed, as the court shall direct. We have examined the state of the case for the purpose of determining which one of these courses shall be followed, and we reach the conclusion that the decree brought up by the present appeal should be affirmed. It will be so ordered.

[333]*333For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ÁCKERSON-14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was properly noticed, for argument, and upon the call of the list was announced to be submitted upon briefs by agreement of counsel. The brief for the respondent was submitted within the time limited by the rule, but no brief has been received from the appellant, nor has any explanation or excuse been furnished to us for the failure. Standing rule No. 17 of this court provides that in case the appellant, after noticing the case for argument, shall fail to bring on the hearing according to rule, the order or decree appealed from shall be affirmed, or the appeal dismissed, as the court shall direct. We have examined the state of the case for the purpose of determining which one of these courses shall be followed, and we reach the conclusion that the decree brought up by the present appeal should be affirmed. It will be so ordered.

[333]*333For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ÁCKERSON-14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A. 347, 91 N.J. Eq. 332, 6 Stock. 332, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-guaranty-trust-co-nj-1920.