Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.

243 A.D. 703

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Action for the foreclosure of a second mortgage on certain real property. A defense based on the claim that the plaintiff and defendant predecessor were negligent and estopped to assert that a certain release was a forgery held insufficient in law and in fact. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Hulburt v. Walker, 258 N. Y. 8; Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 id. 458.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for the foreclosure of a second mortgage on certain real property. A defense based on the claim that the plaintiff and defendant predecessor were negligent and estopped to assert that a certain release was a forgery held insufficient in law and in fact. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Hulburt v. Walker, 258 N. Y. 8; Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 id. 458.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp., 243 A.D. 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 703 (Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related