Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.

243 A.D. 703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 703 (Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloom v. Gertrude Holding Corp., 243 A.D. 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for the foreclosure of a second mortgage on certain real property. A defense based on the claim that the plaintiff and defendant predecessor were negligent and estopped to assert that a certain release was a forgery held insufficient in law and in fact. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Hulburt v. Walker, 258 N. Y. 8; Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 id. 458.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for the foreclosure of a second mortgage on certain real property. A defense based on the claim that the plaintiff and defendant predecessor were negligent and estopped to assert that a certain release was a forgery held insufficient in law and in fact. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Hulburt v. Walker, 258 N. Y. 8; Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 id. 458.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-gertrude-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack