Bloom v. Gelb

227 A.D. 619
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state a cause of action in equity affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint states a cause of action at law and that precludes a dismissal of the complaint even though the prayer for relief is equitable in its character. The prayer for relief is not the determining factor with respect to the character of the cause of action set out in the complaint. (Traub v. Arrow Manufacturing Corporation, 207 App. Div. 292, 296.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloom v. Gelb, 227 A.D. 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 619 (Bloom v. Gelb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. Burnside
16 Misc. 2d 1089 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Queens Machine Corp.
254 A.D. 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Vella v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
245 A.D. 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Fahnestock v. Clark Henry Corp.
151 Misc. 593 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Boylan v. Vogel
147 Misc. 554 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)