Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

184 N.E. 129, 260 N.Y. 646, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 838
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1932·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman and Kellogg, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 184 N.E. 129, 260 N.Y. 646, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. 1932).

184 N.E. 129 (Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.