Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
184 N.E. 129, 260 N.Y. 646, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 838
This text of 184 N.E. 129 (Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bloom v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 184 N.E. 129, 260 N.Y. 646, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman and Kellogg, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 N.E. 129, 260 N.Y. 646, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-fidelity-and-deposit-company-of-maryland-ny-1932.