Bloom v. Crane

24 Ill. 48
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Catón, C. J.

After a careful consideration of the evidence in this record, we are inclined to the opinion that, we should have been better satisfied with a verdict for the plaintiff; but it is not so destitute of evidence to support it, as to warrant us in reversing the judgment of the court below, which refused to set aside the verdict. Here is a fair conflict of evidence in a case peculiarly appropriate for the determination of a jury. Upon a trial without exception, the jury found their verdict which met the sanction of the court before which the cause was tried, and we do not feel at liberty to disturb that verdict.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloom v. Crane, 24 Ill. 48 (Ill. 1860).

24 Ill. 48 (Bloom v. Crane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rassbeck v. Desterreicher
55 How. Pr. 516 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)
Raisbeck v. Oesterricher
4 Abb. N. Cas. 444 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)