Bloom v. Crane

24 Ill. 48
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 Ill. 48 (Bloom v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloom v. Crane, 24 Ill. 48 (Ill. 1860).

Opinion

Catón, C. J.

After a careful consideration of the evidence in this record, we are inclined to the opinion that, we should have been better satisfied with a verdict for the plaintiff; but it is not so destitute of evidence to support it, as to warrant us in reversing the judgment of the court below, which refused to set aside the verdict. Here is a fair conflict of evidence in a case peculiarly appropriate for the determination of a jury. Upon a trial without exception, the jury found their verdict which met the sanction of the court before which the cause was tried, and we do not feel at liberty to disturb that verdict.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rassbeck v. Desterreicher
55 How. Pr. 516 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)
Raisbeck v. Oesterricher
4 Abb. N. Cas. 444 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ill. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-crane-ill-1860.