Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg

574 A.2d 602, 524 Pa. 588, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 134
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 1990·No. Appeal No. 43 M.D. Appeal Dkt.1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg, 574 A.2d 602, 524 Pa. 588, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 134 (Pa. 1990).

574 A.2d 602 (Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huffman v. Borough of Millvale
591 A.2d 1137 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Rosen v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.
582 A.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)