Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg

574 A.2d 602, 524 Pa. 588, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 134
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 23, 1990
DocketAppeal No. 43 M.D. Appeal Dkt.1989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 574 A.2d 602 (Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloom v. Borough of Philipsburg, 574 A.2d 602, 524 Pa. 588, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 134 (Pa. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huffman v. Borough of Millvale
591 A.2d 1137 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Rosen v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.
582 A.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 A.2d 602, 524 Pa. 588, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-borough-of-philipsburg-pa-1990.