Bloom v. Bonvicino
This text of 546 So. 2d 807 (Bloom v. Bonvicino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record in this appeal demonstrates genuine issues of material fact which precluded the entry of a summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Coastal Habitat, Inc. v. City Nat’l. Bank, 516 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to the merit or lack of merit in the evidentiary issues raised by the parties.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 So. 2d 807, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1825, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 1989 WL 85235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-bonvicino-fladistctapp-1989.