Bloom v. Bonvicino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bloom v. Bonvicino

546 So. 2d 807, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1825, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 1989 WL 85235

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1989·No. Nos. 89-0163, 89-0452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record in this appeal demonstrates genuine issues of material fact which precluded the entry of a summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Coastal Habitat, Inc. v. City Nat’l. Bank, 516 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to the merit or lack of merit in the evidentiary issues raised by the parties.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record in this appeal demonstrates genuine issues of material fact which precluded the entry of a summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Coastal Habitat, Inc. v. City Nat’l. Bank, 516 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting summary final judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to the merit or lack of merit in the evidentiary issues raised by the parties.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Bloom v. Bonvicino, 546 So. 2d 807, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1825, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358, 1989 WL 85235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

546 So. 2d 807 (Bloom v. Bonvicino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related