Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.

1 White & W. 395

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 11, 1879·No. No. 499, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 474·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 722. Trial of the right of property; judgment in. On failure of the claimants to establish their claim, the judgment should have been so rendered as to fix the lien covered by the attachment, and subjecting the property to sale to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in the suit out of which the attachment issued. On failure to return the property for that purpose, the law fixes the remedy against the obligors upon the claim bond. [Mardis v. Johnson, 43 Tex. 225.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 722. Trial of the right of property; judgment in. On failure of the claimants to establish their claim, the judgment should have been so rendered as to fix the lien covered by the attachment, and subjecting the property to sale to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in the suit out of which the attachment issued. On failure to return the property for that purpose, the law fixes the remedy against the obligors upon the claim bond. [Mardis v. Johnson, 43 Tex. 225.]

Reversed and remanded.

Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co., 1 White & W. 395 (Tex. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

1 White & W. 395 (Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related