Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.

1 White & W. 395

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 11, 1879

DocketNo. 499, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 474

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 395 (Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bloom v. A. Baldwin & Co., 1 White & W. 395 (Tex. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 722. Trial of the right of property; judgment in. On failure of the claimants to establish their claim, the judgment should have been so rendered as to fix the lien covered by the attachment, and subjecting the property to sale to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in the suit out of which the attachment issued. On failure to return the property for that purpose, the law fixes the remedy against the obligors upon the claim bond. [Mardis v. Johnson, 43 Tex. 225.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 722. Trial of the right of property; judgment in. On failure of the claimants to establish their claim, the judgment should have been so rendered as to fix the lien covered by the attachment, and subjecting the property to sale to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in the suit out of which the attachment issued. On failure to return the property for that purpose, the law fixes the remedy against the obligors upon the claim bond. [Mardis v. Johnson, 43 Tex. 225.]

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloom-v-a-baldwin-co-texapp-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack