Bloodworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
870 So. 2d 539, 2003 La.App. 3 Cir. 1584, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 849, 2004 WL 737458
Opinion
For reasons set forth in the companion case of Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 03-1582 (La.App. 3 Cir.4/7/04); 870 So.2d 531, 2004 WL 737442, this matter is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assigned the appellant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., d/b/a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bloodworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 870 So. 2d 539, 2003 La.App. 3 Cir. 1584, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 849, 2004 WL 737458 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
870 So. 2d 539 (Bloodworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
870 So. 2d 531 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)