Bloodworth v. State
145 S.E. 892, 39 Ga. App. 16, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 472
This text of 145 S.E. 892 (Bloodworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bloodworth v. State, 145 S.E. 892, 39 Ga. App. 16, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the single special ground of the motion for a new trial can not be considered, for the reason that it is not complete and understandable by itself.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 892, 39 Ga. App. 16, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloodworth-v-state-gactapp-1928.