Bloodworth v. Carroll

463 So. 2d 1313, 1985 La. LEXIS 8040

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bloodworth v. Carroll. Read the opinion of the Court — 463 So. 2d 1313 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 15, 1985·No. No. 84-C-1780·Published

Opinion

In re Carroll, Donald Buford; Rushing, Charlette; Phoenix Insurance Company, applying for writ of certiorari, writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 16374-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 286386.

Prior report: 455 So.2d 1197.

Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of Snider v. Kemper, 461 So.2d 1051, decided January 14, 1985.

DENNIS and WATSON, JJ., dissent, being of the opinion that the Court of Appeal’s decision is correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prior report: 455 So.2d 1197.

Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of Snider v. Kemper, 461 So.2d 1051, decided January 14, 1985.

DENNIS and WATSON, JJ., dissent, being of the opinion that the Court of Appeal’s decision is correct.

Bloodworth v. Carroll, 463 So. 2d 1313, 1985 La. LEXIS 8040 (La. 1985).

Pincite

463 So. 2d 1313 (Bloodworth v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Snider v. Murray

461 So. 2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)

Bloodworth v. Carroll

455 So. 2d 1197 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)

Opinion

Related