Bloodsaw, Talisha v. Alexian Brothers Community Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers PACE

2020 TN WC 56
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 16, 2020
Docket2019-01-0653
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 56 (Bloodsaw, Talisha v. Alexian Brothers Community Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers PACE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloodsaw, Talisha v. Alexian Brothers Community Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers PACE, 2020 TN WC 56 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA Talisha Bloodsaw, ) Docket No. 2019-01-0653 Employee, ) V. ) Alexian Brothers Community ) Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers ) State File No. 5799-2019 PACE, ) Employer, ) And ) Ascension Health, ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick Self-Insured Parent Co. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Talisha Bloodsaw allegedly injured her chest wall while assisting a patient. She then sought emergent care for her injuries, which Alexian Brothers refused to pay. Following an Expedited Hearing, the Court holds she is not entitled to the requested benefit.

History of Claim

Ms. Bloodsaw, a PACE driver, allegedly injured her chest wall on July 18, 2019, when she prevented a patient from falling and assisted him into a seated walker with the help of the patient’s daughter, Debra Wooten.!

The parties’ testimony differs regarding the alleged incident. Ms. Bloodsaw said she injured herself during the incident; however, Ms. Wooten testified by affidavit that Ms. Bloodsaw refused to assist her and did not touch her father.

' As a PACE driver, Ms. Bloodsaw’s job duties required her to pick up patients and transport them to a geriatric daycare. Likewise, the testimony differs regarding the events that occurred after Ms. Bloodsaw left the patient’s house and returned with a wheelchair. Terry Black, her supervisor, testified that he accompanied her to the patient’s house, where they found him on the floor. Ms. Bloodsaw stated she lifted the patient using his pants and gait belt to guide him into the wheelchair. Conversely, Mr. Black and Ms. Wooten testified that Ms. Bloodsaw did not touch the patient or assist them in any way when they lifted and placed him into the wheelchair.

The next day, Ms. Bloodsaw became ill after eating breakfast out with her co- workers. Upon arriving at PACE, Mr. Black took Ms. Bloodsaw to the onsite clinic, where she refused testing. Mr. Black told her to go to the hospital if her condition worsened.

Ms. Bloodsaw immediately left work and sought emergency treatment later that day. The emergency room record, which she disputed, noted that she reported her symptoms started at 10:00 a.m. “while on [a] bus.” The provider diagnosed nonspecific chest pain. Ms. Bloodsaw testified that she told the discharge person that she injured herself while lifting a patient, but the records do not document that conversation.

The testimony also differed about when Ms. Bloodsaw reported the alleged work injury and emergency treatment to Mr. Black. Ms. Bloodsaw testified she left voice messages on Mr. Black’s work and cell phones over the weekend to tell him that she went to the hospital. She also stated she reported her injury to Mr. Black on July 22, but her affidavit says she provided notice on July 23. Mr. Black stated that Ms. Bloodsaw reported a work injury on July 22.

After Ms. Bloodsaw reported the injury, PACE provided a panel of physicians. Ms. Bloodsaw told the authorized physician she was “lifting a patient on 7/18/19 at about 10:00 a.m. and... the patient fell and took [her] down.”

After investigating, PACE denied Ms. Bloodsaw’s claim asserting that the alleged incident on July 18 did not occur.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Standard Applied

Ms. Bloodsaw must present sufficient evidence demonstrating she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019). The Court holds she did not satisfy this burden. Analysis

To prove a compensable injury, Ms. Bloodsaw must show that her alleged injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. To do so, she must show that the injury was caused by a specific work-related incident, or set of incidents, identifiable by time and place of occurrence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A).

The preliminary question the Court must address is whether Ms. Bloodsaw presented sufficient evidence to establish the occurrence of a specific incident on July 18, 2019. See Burleson v. Germantown Partners Supercuts, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 49, at *9-10 (Aug. 15, 2017). The Court holds she did not.

The conflicting testimony from Ms. Bloodsaw, Mr. Black, and Ms. Wooten suggests that a work-related incident did not occur on July 18. Ms. Bloodsaw testified that she prevented a patient from falling and assisted him onto a seated walker with the assistance of Ms. Wooten. She also testified she later lifted the patient into a wheelchair by grabbing his pants and gait belt. Conversely, Mr. Black and Ms. Wooten testified that Ms. Bloodsaw did not touch the patient or assist them in any way on July 18. Likewise, the July 19 emergency records immediately following the alleged incident do not mention a work injury. Instead, the records reflect a diagnosis of non-specific chest pain. The records from the authorized physician provide a differing history regarding a patient who fell and “took [Ms. Bloodsaw] down.” Given the conflicting testimony and evidence, the Court finds no corroboration of Ms. Bloodsaw’s testimony concerning the alleged work-related incident.

Accordingly, the Court holds Ms. Bloodsaw failed to demonstrate that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to payment for her emergent care.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. The Court denies Ms. Bloodsaw’s requested relief.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Friday, August 14, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call (423) 634-0164 or toll-free at (855) 383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED June 16, 2020.

JUDGE’AUDREY A. HEADRICK Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims APPENDIX

Exhibits:

PINNAME WN

Affidavit of Talisha Bloodsaw

Affidavit of Terry Black

Affidavit of Debra Wooten

Memorial Hospital records

Workforce Corporation Health records

Affidavit of Stephanie Parker

Workforce Corporate Health August 27, 2019 record Memorial Hospital bill (Identification Only)

Technical record:

CHNAKRWN

Petition for Benefit Determination

Notice of Appearance

Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing

Notice of No Objection

Order Setting Claim for Expedited Hearing

Notice of Efforts to Schedule Expedited Hearing Motion to Reconsider

Amended Order Setting Claim for Expedited Hearing

10. Notice of Expedited Hearing

11.Employer’s Statement

12.Employer’s and Insurance Carrier’s Witness and Exhibit List 13. Notice CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on June 16, 2020.

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to: Mail Talisha Bloodsaw, xX xX 4108 Gayle Drive Employee Chattanooga, TN 37411 talishabloodsaw @ gmail.com Lee Anne Murray, 4 leeamurray @ feeneymurray.com Employer’s Attorney

Jo Ua

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk @ tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloodsaw-talisha-v-alexian-brothers-community-services-dba-alexian-tennworkcompcl-2020.