Bloodgood v. Vanderveer

3 N.J.L. 928
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1812·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— The jury in rendering their verdict ought to have designated the particular offences which they found against the defendant; and judgment should have been rendered on these specific offences. This error in a penal action, wherein strictness is required, cannot be got over. Judgment Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodgood v. Vanderveer, 3 N.J.L. 928 (N.J. 1812).

3 N.J.L. 928 (Bloodgood v. Vanderveer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.