Bloodgood v. Gregory

6 Jones & S. 132
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedOctober 31, 1874
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Jones & S. 132 (Bloodgood v. Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloodgood v. Gregory, 6 Jones & S. 132 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Opinion

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

For the reasons assigned in Cary v. Gregory, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant, to abide the event. r

Yan Yorst and Speir, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Jones & S. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloodgood-v-gregory-nysuperctnyc-1874.