Blood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blood v. State

100 S.E. 761, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 632

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 4, 1919

Docket10797

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 761 (Blood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blood v. State, 100 S.E. 761, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 632 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is presented here upon the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict. It was the right and province of the jury to credit such witnesses and circumstances as they, under an appropriate charge of the court,, deemed satisfied them beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is presented here upon the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict. It was the right and province of the jury to credit such witnesses and circumstances as they, under an appropriate charge of the court,, deemed satisfied them beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 761, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blood-v-state-gactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack