Blood v. State

100 S.E. 761, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 632
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1919·No. 10797·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is presented here upon the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict. It was the right and province of the jury to credit such witnesses and circumstances as they, under an appropriate charge of the court,, deemed satisfied them beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blood v. State, 100 S.E. 761, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 632 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 761 (Blood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Taylor
96 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)