Blood v. Pixley

California Supreme Court

Blood v. Pixley

1 Cal. Unrep. 1

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1855

DocketNo. 587

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 1 (Blood v. Pixley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blood v. Pixley, 1 Cal. Unrep. 1 (Cal. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

MURRAY, C. J.

— This case was improperly tried under the old act concerning appeals from justices ’ to county courts, after the present act had gone into effect, and the parties, if they felt themselves injured by the first decision of the county court, should have appealed to this court; it is, however, now too late to correct this informality. The second judgment of the county court, now appealed from, is void, under the former decisions of this court, as the judge who tried the case has failed to find his conclusions of law and fact, as required by the statute.

Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, costs to abide the result.

Me concur: Heydenfeldt, J.; Bryan, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURRAY, C. J.

— This case was improperly tried under the old act concerning appeals from justices ’ to county courts, after the present act had gone into effect, and the parties, if they felt themselves injured by the first decision of the county court, should have appealed to this court; it is, however, now too late to correct this informality. The second judgment of the county court, now appealed from, is void, under the former decisions of this court, as the judge who tried the case has failed to find his conclusions of law and fact, as required by the statute.

Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, costs to abide the result.

Me concur: Heydenfeldt, J.; Bryan, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blood-v-pixley-cal-1855.