Blood v. Pearson

Eighth Circuit

Blood v. Pearson

124 F.2d 787, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4556

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 13, 1942·No. No. 12106·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.

The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.

The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Blood v. Pearson, 124 F.2d 787, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4556 (8th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

124 F.2d 787 (Blood v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related