Blood v. Pearson

Eighth Circuit

Blood v. Pearson

124 F.2d 787, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4556

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 1942

DocketNo. 12106

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 F.2d 787 (Blood v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blood v. Pearson, 124 F.2d 787, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4556 (8th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.

The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.

The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 F.2d 787, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blood-v-pearson-ca8-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack