Blood v. Beadle
65 Ala. 103
Opinion
— On the authority of Ex parte Wallcer, 54 Ala. 577, we feel bound to hold the petition in this case fatally defective. The surprise, or accident complained of, is but the oversight of counsel, which is no excuse for the client. The affidavit is also fatally defective, in not disclosing when the Circuit Court finally adjourned, and in not giving a satisfactory excuse why the claimant did not make an application and showing for a new trial before the adjournment sine die of that term of the court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blood v. Beadle, 65 Ala. 103 (Ala. 1880).
65 Ala. 103 (Blood v. Beadle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lucy v. Hall
87 So. 2d 32 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of Opelika
11 So. 2d 854 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Hatton v. Moseley
156 So. 546 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Craft v. Hirsh
149 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Williams v. Tyler
71 So. 51 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Hendley v. Chabert
65 So. 993 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Freeman v. Gragg
73 Ala. 199 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)