Blonsky v. Sidi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blonsky v. Sidi

210 A.D.2d 277, 620 N.Y.S.2d 290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 277 (Blonsky v. Sidi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blonsky v. Sidi, 210 A.D.2d 277, 620 N.Y.S.2d 290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiffs from three orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 13, 1992, May 27, 1992, and February 3, [278]*2781993, respectively, and a judgment of the same court, dated May 13,1993.

Ordered that the appeals from the orders are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Milano in the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI