Blonsky v. Blonsky
This text of 272 A.D.2d 959 (Blonsky v. Blonsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law, motion denied, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the present state of the record does not divulge all of the facts necessary to reach a conclusion as to whether an estoppel arises by reason of the final decree following an interlocutory decree entered June 26, 1933, in the action of the present plaintiff Alice C. Taylor against Oscar S., sometimes known as Arthur S., Taylor. All concur, except Love, J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for separation.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blonsky-v-blonsky-nyappdiv-1947.