Blomquist v. Blomquist

127 So. 728, 99 Fla. 858
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 728 (Blomquist v. Blomquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blomquist v. Blomquist, 127 So. 728, 99 Fla. 858 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record and briefs in this cause have been examined carefully. There are two assignments of error, reversal on the basis of either of which depends on the state of the evidence. The evidence contains many con *859 fliets which were reviewed and settled by both the special master and the chancellor. On the showing made we are unable to say that error was committed. At least three-fourths of the evidence had no bearing whatever on the issues raised. It is but fair to say that counsel who bring the case here were not responsible for this.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 So. 728, 99 Fla. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blomquist-v-blomquist-fla-1930.