Blomquest v. Gardner
48 So. 724, 95 Miss. 307
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
On a careful consideration of this whole case, we cannot assent to the findings of the court below that Mrs. Gardner did not sign the deed in queston. On the facts of this case-, with the witnesses who could clear up this transaction all dead, it should be made to appear by the most undoubted proof that the deed was never signed, and in this we think the testimony fails.
The decree is reversed, and bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blomquest v. Gardner, 48 So. 724, 95 Miss. 307 (Mich. 1909).
48 So. 724 (Blomquest v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. B. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc.
120 So. 732 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
State ex rel. Nall v. Williams
54 So. 951 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)