Blomquest v. Gardner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Blomquest v. Gardner

48 So. 724, 95 Miss. 307

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 So. 724 (Blomquest v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blomquest v. Gardner, 48 So. 724, 95 Miss. 307 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Mates, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On a careful consideration of this whole case, we cannot assent to the findings of the court below that Mrs. Gardner did not sign the deed in queston. On the facts of this case-, with the witnesses who could clear up this transaction all dead, it should be made to appear by the most undoubted proof that the deed was never signed, and in this we think the testimony fails.

The decree is reversed, and bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mates, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On a careful consideration of this whole case, we cannot assent to the findings of the court below that Mrs. Gardner did not sign the deed in queston. On the facts of this case-, with the witnesses who could clear up this transaction all dead, it should be made to appear by the most undoubted proof that the deed was never signed, and in this we think the testimony fails.

The decree is reversed, and bill dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 So. 724, 95 Miss. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blomquest-v-gardner-miss-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack