Blom v. Blom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blom v. Blom

139 S.W.3d 632, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1108, 2004 WL 1698017

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2004

DocketWD 62347

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.W.3d 632 (Blom v. Blom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blom v. Blom, 139 S.W.3d 632, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1108, 2004 WL 1698017 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Blom appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Anita Blom. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to divide a marital debt and in awarding attorney’s fees. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Blom appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Anita Blom. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to divide a marital debt and in awarding attorney’s fees. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 S.W.3d 632, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1108, 2004 WL 1698017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blom-v-blom-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack