Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bloeth v. Cyrta

Bloeth v. Cyrta

21 A.D.2d 979, 243 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2850
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 20, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 979 (Bloeth v. Cyrta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloeth v. Cyrta, 21 A.D.2d 979, 243 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Motion by appellant for assignment of counsel to prosecute appeal, denied without prejudice to renewal after appellant shall have filed and served a timely notice of appeal from the order. No appeal lies from a decision of a court, but only from the order or [980]*980judgment entered thereon. Beldock, P. J., ICleinfeld, Brennan, Raibin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Mitchell v. Fay
241 F. Supp. 165 (S.D. New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.2d 979, 243 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloeth-v-cyrta-nyappdiv-1963.