Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp.

585 S.E.2d 233, 262 Ga. App. 298, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 903

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 2003

DocketA01A0922

StatusPublished

This text of 585 S.E.2d 233 (Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 585 S.E.2d 233, 262 Ga. App. 298, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Mikell, Judge.

' In Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 251 Ga. App. XXV (September 18, 2001), issued pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals, we affirmed without opinion the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Fieldale. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, in Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 275 Ga. 798 (573 SE2d 36) (2002), reversed our judgment as to Blockum’s claims of breach of written contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and racial discrimination pursuant to 42 USC §§ 1981 and 1982. The Court affirmed as to Blockum’s claims of economic coercion, breach of [299]*299oral contract, fraud, and misrepresentation. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Decided July 14, 2003. George W. McGriff, for appellant. Victor Blockum, pro se. Alston & Bird, Jay D. Bennett, Paul J. Kaplan, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Blackburn, P. J., and Adams; J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mikell, Judge.

' In Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 251 Ga. App. XXV (September 18, 2001), issued pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals, we affirmed without opinion the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Fieldale. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, in Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp., 275 Ga. 798 (573 SE2d 36) (2002), reversed our judgment as to Blockum’s claims of breach of written contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and racial discrimination pursuant to 42 USC §§ 1981 and 1982. The Court affirmed as to Blockum’s claims of economic coercion, breach of [299]*299oral contract, fraud, and misrepresentation. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Decided July 14, 2003. George W. McGriff, for appellant. Victor Blockum, pro se. Alston & Bird, Jay D. Bennett, Paul J. Kaplan, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Blackburn, P. J., and Adams; J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 S.E.2d 233, 262 Ga. App. 298, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blockum-v-fieldale-farms-corp-gactapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack