Blockton v. State
738 S.W.2d 488, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4549
This text of 738 S.W.2d 488 (Blockton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blockton v. State, 738 S.W.2d 488, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4549 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 S.W.2d 488, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blockton-v-state-moctapp-1987.