Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blocker v. Tanzi

Blocker v. Tanzi

174 So. 3d 576, 2015 WL 5139467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 2, 2015
DocketNo. 4D14-4297
StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 3d 576 (Blocker v. Tanzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blocker v. Tanzi, 174 So. 3d 576, 2015 WL 5139467 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying Blocker’s motion for attorney’s fees. The motion was timely served as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.442(b). R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Coates, 93 So.3d 1151 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., and HERSCH, RICHARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Coates
93 So. 3d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 3d 576, 2015 WL 5139467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blocker-v-tanzi-fladistctapp-2015.