Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Blocker v. Tanzi

Blocker v. Tanzi

174 So. 3d 576, 2015 WL 5139467
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 2015·No. No. 4D14-4297·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying Blocker’s motion for attorney’s fees. The motion was timely served as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.442(b). R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Coates, 93 So.3d 1151 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., and HERSCH, RICHARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blocker v. Tanzi, 174 So. 3d 576, 2015 WL 5139467 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

174 So. 3d 576 (Blocker v. Tanzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Coates
93 So. 3d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)