Blocker v. State
555 So. 2d 982, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 1990 WL 6453
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1990·No. No. 88-3018·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion or harmful error in the trial court’s refusal to cause the testimony of one witness to be read back to the jury at the jury’s request. DeCastro v. State, 360 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978).
We reverse the imposition of costs which were assessed without giving appellant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Hernandez v. State, 547 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We remand for a proper hearing with notice.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blocker v. State, 555 So. 2d 982, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 1990 WL 6453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
555 So. 2d 982 (Blocker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. State
569 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)