Blocker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blocker v. State

555 So. 2d 982, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 1990 WL 6453

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1990

DocketNo. 88-3018

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 555 So. 2d 982 (Blocker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blocker v. State, 555 So. 2d 982, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 1990 WL 6453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion or harmful error in the trial court’s refusal to cause the testimony of one witness to be read back to the jury at the jury’s request. DeCastro v. State, 360 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978).

We reverse the imposition of costs which were assessed without giving appellant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Hernandez v. State, 547 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We remand for a proper hearing with notice.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI