Blocker v. Michigan, State of

District Court, W.D. Michigan·Decided November 24, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00988·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION COREY BLOCKER, Plaintiff, File no: 1:20-CV-988 v. HON. ROBERT J. JONKER STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants. /

ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on October 30, 2020 (ECF No. 10). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 10) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED. The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Date: November 24, 2020 /s/ Robert J. Jonker ROBERT J. JONKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blocker v. Michigan, State of, (W.D. Mich. 2020).

Blocker v. Michigan, State of (Blocker v. Michigan, State of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related