Blocker v. Irvine

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blocker v. Irvine

72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 26, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 621

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1911

Docket3376

StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.E. 510 (Blocker v. Irvine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blocker v. Irvine, 72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 26, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

The only assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling a general demurrer to the petition. As originally drawn the petition was subject to demurrer. Before the demurrer was passed on, the court allowed an amendment fully curing the deficiency. The only question argued in this court is whether the court erred in allowing the amendment. The assignment of error is inadequate to raise this question. ■■ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The only assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling a general demurrer to the petition. As originally drawn the petition was subject to demurrer. Before the demurrer was passed on, the court allowed an amendment fully curing the deficiency. The only question argued in this court is whether the court erred in allowing the amendment. The assignment of error is inadequate to raise this question. ■■ Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 26, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blocker-v-irvine-gactapp-1911.