Block v. Nathanson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Block v. Nathanson

92 N.Y.S. 1116

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1116 (Block v. Nathanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Block v. Nathanson, 92 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

The pleadings were oral. Defendant’s plea as returned was: “General denial. Demand bill. Admit $11.40.” After judgment the defendant moved, not to vacate the judgment absolutely,' but to modify and reduce it to $13.40. The whole course of appellant, throughout the trial and after, seems to indicate that he. admitted his indebtedness for a_ proportionate past of the monthly rent, for his use and occupation of the premises, and that he intended to qualify his general denial by that admission. The judgment should be reduced to $13.40, and, as reduced, affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, J.

The pleadings were oral. Defendant’s plea as returned was: “General denial. Demand bill. Admit $11.40.” After judgment the defendant moved, not to vacate the judgment absolutely,' but to modify and reduce it to $13.40. The whole course of appellant, throughout the trial and after, seems to indicate that he. admitted his indebtedness for a_ proportionate past of the monthly rent, for his use and occupation of the premises, and that he intended to qualify his general denial by that admission. The judgment should be reduced to $13.40, and, as reduced, affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-nathanson-nyappterm-1905.