Block v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
This text of 162 Misc. 325 (Block v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of the opinion that cigarettes are not within the class of dangerous articles which render their manufacturer liable to strangers for a defect such as is complained of here. (Jaroniec v. Hasselbarth, Inc., 223 App. Div. 182; Byers v. Flushovalve Co., 160 N. Y. Supp. 1050; affd., 178 App. Div. 894; Hasbrouck v. Armour & Company, 139 Wis. 357; 121 N. W. 157.)
Judgment reversed, with thiity dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.
Lydon and Hammer, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 Misc. 325, 296 N.Y.S. 922, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-liggett-myers-tobacco-co-nyappterm-1937.