Block v. Haas

8 Abb. Pr. 335
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 15, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Abb. Pr. 335 (Block v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Block v. Haas, 8 Abb. Pr. 335 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1859).

Opinion

Hilton, J.

The plaintiff, being a non-resident of the State, asks for a commission to examine himself and others as witnesses on his behalf.

Prior to the amendments of the Code, in April, 1859, it was held that this examination of a non-resident party under a commission could not be had, unless the opposite party had given notice of his intended examination at the trial. But section 399 has been amended to obviate this objection, and the notice of intended examination of a party is no longer required. A party may now be examined the same as any other witness (except in certain specified cases), and without previous notice; and if he resides out of the jurisdiction of the court, he may be examined by a commission issued and executed in the usual manner.

The motion for a commission is therefore granted; costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Abb. Pr. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-haas-nyctcompl-1859.