Block v. Garden Fresh Restaurants LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 14, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00156·Unknown

Opinion

WwOAOD 1.420 UV VULNS OAD bMVVULTICEit LY Vif aoney Payee +ViIst

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 | HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:20-cv-00156-NONE-SAB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 10 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 11 | GARDEN FRESH RESTAURANTS LLC, et | OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL al., PROCEDURE 12 Defendants. (ECF No. 15) 13 14 15 On July 13, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 16 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 17 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 18 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 19 | attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 21 | this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary 22 | dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 95 | Dated: _ July 14, 2020 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Block v. Garden Fresh Restaurants LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Block v. Garden Fresh Restaurants LLC (Block v. Garden Fresh Restaurants LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)