Block v. Farley

143 Misc. 785, 257 N.Y.S. 392, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1093
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 12, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While, ordinarily, the United States courts are courts of limited jurisdiction they are given exclusive jurisdiction in bankruptcy and, therefore, their orders and judgments possess all the incidents and qualities of finality of courts of general jurisdiction in such matters. (Sabin v. Larkin-Green Logging Co., 218 Fed. 984.) In the instant case it appeared on the face of the order discharging the prisoner that it was made in bankruptcy proceedings, which was the fact. Therefore, the ministerial officer was protected in obeying the order of discharge. {Levy v. Melody, 50 Misc. 509.)

Order modified to the extent of denying the motion to dismiss the first separate defense, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untekmyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Block v. Farley, 143 Misc. 785, 257 N.Y.S. 392, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

143 Misc. 785 (Block v. Farley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lang v. Dreyer
170 Misc. 207 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Land Finance Corp. v. Jacoby
151 Misc. 159 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Block v. Farley
236 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)