Block v. City of Charlevoix

Michigan Supreme Court

Block v. City of Charlevoix

267 Mich. 255

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 1934

DocketDocket No. 151, Calendar No. 37,778

StatusPublished

This text of 267 Mich. 255 (Block v. City of Charlevoix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Block v. City of Charlevoix, 267 Mich. 255 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Nelson Sharpe, C. J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed to enjoin the defendant city and its officials from entering into a contract for the sale of self-liquidating bonds to be used in the construction of a sewage disposal plant under the provisions of Act No. 94, Pub. Acts 1933. The trial court held the act to be unconstitutional and granted the relief prayed for, from which the defendants have appealed.

In Young v. City of Ann Arbor, ante, 241, in which a similar question was presented, this act was held to be constitutional and the right to enter into such a contract sustained. Decision in this case is controlled thereby.

The decree appealed from is reversed, and one may be here entered dismissing the bill. No costs will be allowed.

Potter, Fead, Wiest, Butzel, Bushnell and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred. North, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson Sharpe, C. J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed to enjoin the defendant city and its officials from entering into a contract for the sale of self-liquidating bonds to be used in the construction of a sewage disposal plant under the provisions of Act No. 94, Pub. Acts 1933. The trial court held the act to be unconstitutional and granted the relief prayed for, from which the defendants have appealed.

In Young v. City of Ann Arbor, ante, 241, in which a similar question was presented, this act was held to be constitutional and the right to enter into such a contract sustained. Decision in this case is controlled thereby.

The decree appealed from is reversed, and one may be here entered dismissing the bill. No costs will be allowed.

Potter, Fead, Wiest, Butzel, Bushnell and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred. North, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 Mich. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-city-of-charlevoix-mich-1934.