Block v. Butt
This text of 84 N.E. 357 (Block v. Butt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question for decision arises on the sustaining of appellee’s motion to strike from the files appellant’s objections to his confirmation as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Albert W. Butt, he having been appointed and qualified as such on August 16, 1905. For ground of objection to such confirmation appellant set up that she was the widow of the decedent, who died testate. That one item of his will was as follows:
“I give, devise and bequeath all my real estate, and personal estate whatsoever and wheresoever unto my wife Alviena Butt, her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns for her and their own use and benefit forever. ’ ’
That said Albert W. Butt departed life December 2, .1899; that his will was probated December 9, 1899; that the same [488]*488is in full force and effect, and that by its terms the title to both the real and personal estate owned by the testator vested in her, and she is the owner thereof; that as such legatee and devisee she took possession of the property, real and personal, paid all the debts and expenses; that there are no debts or expenses unpaid so as to require administration; that she is not squandering the estate, but taking care of the same, and using the income for the support of her family.
Election by the widow as to personal property was,.by the legislature of 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 73, §3045 Burns 1908), made the same as to real property, but such act does not govern in this, a case arising prior to its enactment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.E. 357, 41 Ind. App. 487, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-butt-indctapp-1908.