Block v. Brar

E.D. California

Block v. Brar

DecidedJanuary 9, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-01317

StatusUnknown

This text of Block v. Brar (Block v. Brar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Block v. Brar, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01317-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING JANUARY 17, 2023 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 JASKIRAT KAUR BRAR, FORTY-FIVE-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant.

16 17 Hendrik Block (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on October 14, 2022, against Jaskirat Kaur 18 Brar (“Defendant”). On December 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default; the 19 Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant the following day. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 21 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 22 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default judgment. Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is 27 reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). 1 As the only defendant in this matter is in default, the Court shall vacate the mandatory 2 | scheduling conference and set a deadline for a motion for default judgment to be filed. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall 5 file a motion for default judgment; 6 2. The scheduling conference set for January 17, 2023, is VACATED; and 7 3. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply with this order shall result in a 8 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _January 9, 2023 _ Of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01317-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING JANUARY 17, 2023 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 JASKIRAT KAUR BRAR, FORTY-FIVE-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant.

16 17 Hendrik Block (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on October 14, 2022, against Jaskirat Kaur 18 Brar (“Defendant”). On December 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default; the 19 Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant the following day. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 21 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 22 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default judgment. Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is 27 reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). 1 As the only defendant in this matter is in default, the Court shall vacate the mandatory 2 | scheduling conference and set a deadline for a motion for default judgment to be filed. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall 5 file a motion for default judgment; 6 2. The scheduling conference set for January 17, 2023, is VACATED; and 7 3. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply with this order shall result in a 8 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _January 9, 2023 _ Of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Block v. Brar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/block-v-brar-caed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack