Bloch v. Rodriguez

681 N.E.2d 1299, 89 N.Y.2d 1080, 659 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1316
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 13, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 681 N.E.2d 1299 (Bloch v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bloch v. Rodriguez, 681 N.E.2d 1299, 89 N.Y.2d 1080, 659 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1316 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s causes of action for declaratory relief, an accounting, unjust enrichment and damages for breach of a joint venture agreement, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the [1081]*1081remaining portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
681 N.E.2d 1299, 89 N.Y.2d 1080, 659 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bloch-v-rodriguez-ny-1997.